Comparing AutoCzar with other test automation tools:
While some of the famous automation tools are the market leaders by revenue, they have not enhanced the cause of test automation. For instance these tools have strong market penetration and have market share of up to 80%. So, why has test automation, in general, had a failure rate of 85% (according to reports)? is the company more concerned about making money than truly helping organizations to build successful, long-lasting test automation envirnoments?
To compare AutoCzar with other tools, let me give an example: The popular automation tools are like CLI type operating systems (ex; Main Frames, UNIX, BSD) which requires highly skilled technical engineers to work on them or to build applications on these OS, these Engineers have to be trained for years to work on them. AutoCzar is like GUI based Operating system (ex: Windows, Linux or Apple), you don’t need trained professionals nor computer experts to perform your job.
The target users being the testers or business analysts, we can’t expect these community to be programmers.
Looking at the history of these tools, these tools have originated and evolved from a developer’s desk, you can always see a developers perspective rather than a business analyst’s or a tester's perspective. Due to which the testing community makes the necessary adjustments to make the automation program successful, which is time consuming and end up in spending more. AutoCzar is one such tool which is architected, designed and built by pure testing community.
For more comparison, contact us.
Posts
